Sanctified Vision: An Introduction to Early Christian Interpretation to the Bible. “When the Bible Speaks, God Speaks.” In Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy, edited by J. “Introduction: On Debating Inerrancy.” In Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy, edited by J. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008. Participatory Biblical Exegesis: A Theology of Biblical Interpretation.

“The Apostolic Fathers and the Struggle for Christian Identity.” In The Writings of the Apostolic Fathers. “Konsep Otoritas Alkitab Di Hadapan Fakta Kesalahan Tekstual: Sebuah Diskusi Teologis.” Veritas: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan 16, no. “Historical Timeline of the Debate about the Reliability and Inerrancy of the Bible,” n.d. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2004.

Theodore of Mepsuestia: Commentary on the Twelve Prophets. “Reading the Old Testament with the Ancient Church: Exploring the Formation of Early Christian Thought.” In Evangelical Ressourcement: Ancient Sources for The Church’s Future. Reading Scripture with the Church Fathers. Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Bible Doctrine. The Inspiration and Interpretation of Scripture. “The Historic Document of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy.” In Vital Issues in the Inerrancy Debate, edited by F. “Review of Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy.” In Vital Issues in the Inerrancy Debate, edited by F. “Inerrancy and Evangelicals: The Challenge for a New Generation,” n.d. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018.įinn, Nathan. Interpreting Scripture with the Great Tradition: Recovering the Genius of Premodern Exegesis. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.Ĭarter, Craig A. Scripture as Real Presence: Sacramental Exegesis in the Early Church. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.īeeke, Joel R., and Paul M. “From There to Here: The Transmission and Translation of the Bible.” In Scripture and Its Interpretation: A Global, Ecumenical Introduction to the Bible, edited by Michael J.

New York: New York University Press, 2006.īarre, Michael L. “Patristic and Medieval Theologies of Scripture.” In Christian Theologies of Scripture: A Comparative Introduction, edited by Justin S. Bapa-bapa Gereja lebih menekankan natur Kitab Suci sebagai teks spiritual dan supranatural sehingga tidak perlu selalu membuktikan kesahihannya secara historis-faktual, sementara kelompok Injili modern yang menekankan keselarasan wahyu Allah dengan pengetahuan manusia lebih menekankan dimensi akurasi dan historisitas teks sebagai basis ineransi.Īyres, Lewis. Pada dasarnya, perbedaan di antara kedua kelompok tersebut bukan berkaitan dengan problem terminologis, tetapi lebih menunjukkan perbedaan metafisika, epistemologi, prasuposisi hermeneutika, dan kriteria justifikasi yang berbeda terhadap kesahihan Kitab Suci. Komparasi ini dilakukan untuk mencari konstruksi doktrin ineransi yang (lebih) proporsional bagi kalangan Injili masa kini. Artikel ini ditulis untuk menjawab sebuah pertanyaan: apakah persamaan dan perbedaan, serta kontinuitas dan diskontinuitas, dari konsep tentang ineransi Kitab Suci menurut kelompok Injili modern yang direpresentasikan oleh International Council of Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI), yang merumuskan Chicago Statements of Biblical Inerrancy (CSBI) dan dokumen-dokumen pelengkapnya, dengan menurut pandangan kelompok Kristen pra-modern atau Bapa-bapa Gereja. The Church Fathers emphasized Scripture as a spiritual and supernatural text so there was no need to always prove its validity historically and factually, while modern Evangelicals that emphasized the harmony of God's revelation with human knowledge emphasized the dimension of accuracy and historicality as the basis for their concepts on biblical inerrancy.Ībstrak. In fact, the differences between both of them are not essentially related to the terminology problem, but rather show different metaphysical, epistemological, hermeneutical preconpositions, and different justification criteria for the validity of the Scripture.

This comparison was made to seek the construction of a (more) proportionate articulation on the doctrine of biblical inerrancy. This article was written to answer a question: what are the similarities and differences, as well as continuity and discontinuity, on the concept of biblical inerrancy according to modern Evangelical thoughts represented by the International Council of Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI) which formulated the Chicago Statements of Biblical Inerrancy (CSBI) and its supplementary documents compared to the views of pre-modern Christian thoughts or the Church Fathers.

Kapan alkitab ditulis